Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression findings for desire for more children among married, non-pregnant fecund women aged 15–49

From: The effect of family sex composition on fertility desires and family planning behaviors in urban Uttar Pradesh, India

Variables

Want no more vs. want more children /undecided

 

OR (95% CI)

Family sex composition

 

No living children

0.01 (0.00–0.02)***

Zero sons, one or more daughters

0.10 (0.07–0.13)***

Zero daughters, one or more sons

0.44 (0.33–0.58)***

Equal number of sons and daughters

0.98 (0.72–1.34)

Have both sons and daughters, but have more daughters than sons (ref)

1.00

Have both sons and daughters, but have more sons than daughters

3.73 (2.40–5.81)***

Age group

 

15–24

0.04 (0.03–0.06)***

25–29

0.07 (0.05–0.11)***

30–34

0.13 (0.09–0.21)***

35–39

0.33 (0.21–0.53)***

40+ (ref)

1.00

Education

 

None

0.45 (0.36–0.57)***

1–11 years

0.69 (0.56–0.83)***

12+ complete (ref)

1.00

Employed in the past 12 months

 

Yes

1.51 (1.21–1.90)***

No (ref)

1.00

Wealth quintile (six city)

 

Poorest

0.94 (0.76–1.16)

Poor

0.88 (0.71–1.10)

Medium

0.96 (0.77–1.19)

Rich

0.93 (0.74–1.17)

Richest (ref)

1.00

Caste

 

Scheduled caste/tribe

0.63 (0.50–0.79)***

Other backward/extreme backward caste

0.73 (0.61–0.86)***

None (ref)

1.00

Religion

 

Muslim

0.41 (0.34–0.49)***

non-Muslim (ref)

1.00

City

 

Agra

0.72 (0.57–0.92)**

Aligarh

0.99 (0.79–1.24)

Allahabad

1.16 (0.91–1.47)

Gorakhpur (ref)

1.00

Moradabad

0.78 (0.63–0.98)*

Varanasi

1.00 (0.79–1.27)

Residence

 

Slum

0.94 (0.81–1.10)

Non-slum (ref)

1.00

Parity

 

0–1

0.02 (0.02–0.03)***

2

0.31 (0.24–0.39)***

3

0.43 (0.33–0.57)***

4+ (ref)

1.00

  1. Unweighted n = 11,014; +p ≤ .10; *p ≤ .05; **p ≤ .01; ***p ≤ .001.