Dimension addressed | Variable/indicator | Data source |
---|---|---|
Effectiveness at the population level | 1. Contraceptive prevalence rate among women living in lowest two wealth quintiles | Population-based household survey in project areas |
2. % of clients recommending services to others | Endline population-based household survey; voucher validation | |
Effectiveness at the service delivery level | 3. Number of new FP acceptors (disaggregated by long-term versus short-term FP) | Routine service delivery records |
4. Number of clients who never used FP before receiving services from study providers | Routine service delivery records | |
5. Number and% of post-partum (PP) clients accepting an FP method (disaggregated by long-term versus short-term FP) | Routine service delivery records | |
6. % of vouchers validated | External voucher validation survey | |
7. Number and% of service providers adhering to medical/clinical standards | Clinical quality assurance monitoring | |
8. % of family planning services provided through vouchers (disaggregated by FP method) | Routine service data | |
9. % of referrals made by FHE for family planning services | Routine service data | |
Efficiency and process issues | Prospects for sustainability | Financial records |
10. Monthly service income | ||
Cost effectiveness | Financial records; routine service delivery records and registers | |
11. Cost per couple year protection (CYP) | ||
12. Cost per new FP acceptor | ||
Provider attrition/turnover | Baseline and endline service provider assessment | |
13. % of study providers offering FP services at the start of the study who are still participating at the end of the project | ||
Training | Baseline and endline service provider audit | |
14. % of providers trained by MSS on different dimensions of FP who are providing services for which they were trained (disaggregated by type of service, e.g. IUD insertion, PAC FP) |