Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analyses for factors related to fertility knowledge in the Triers group

From: A cross sectional study on fertility knowledge in Japan, measured with the Japanese version of Cardiff Fertility Knowledge Scale (CFKS-J)

 

Univariate association (n = 618)

Multivariate linear regression

(n = 521, R-squared for model = 0.13)

Variables

Mean (SD)

P

Coefficienta

95% confidence interval

P

Socio-demographic

     

 Gender

     

Male

49.9 (23.8)

 

Reference

  

Female

56.3 (22.7)

<0.001

3.28

-0.86 to 7.41

0.12

 Age

     

each additional year older

-0.01b

0.72

-0.22

-0.52 to 0.08

0.16

 Annual household income

     

< 4 million JPY

50.9 (24.1)

 

Reference

  

4 - 7 million JPY

53.0 (23.8)

 

1.56

-2.95 to 6.07

0.50

≥ 8 million JPY

53.0 (23.5)

0.62

1.03

-5.24 to 7.30

0.75

 Educational level

     

No university education

53.5 (23.5)

 

Reference

  

University education

52.7 (23.3)

0.69

-0.94

-5.39 to 3.51

0.68

Fertility

     

 Whether or not given birth

     

Not given birth/fathered a child

54.6 (23.6)

 

Reference

  

Given birth/fathered a child

50.8 (23.0)

0.046

-3.38

-7.42 to 0.67

0.10

 How long trying to conceive

     

Trying to conceive < 12 months

50.5 (23.2)

 

Reference

  

Trying to conceive ≥ 12 months

54.2 (23.5)

0.08

0.15

-4.71 to 5.02

0.95

 Prior medical consultation

     

Not consulted a medical doctor

48.6 (23.2)

 

Reference

  

Consulted a medical doctor

61.6 (21.5)

<0.001

11.64

7.28 to 16.0

<0.001

Health-related skills and behaviour

     

 Smoking status

     

Non-smoking

54.3 (22.8)

 

Reference

  

Smoking

48.7 (25.3)

0.02

-1.89

-7.24 to 3.46

0.49

The score of HLS-14

     

Each additional score higher

0.22c

<0.001

0.59

0.30 to 0.88

<0.001

The score of the Lipkus-J

     

Each additional score higher

0.072c

0.08

0.27

-0.80 to 1.35

0.62

  1. Note: With regards to annual household incomes, 97 people who answered “unknown” were excluded from the analysis.
  2. aNon-standardized coefficient. bPearson’s correlation coefficient.
  3. cSpearman’s correlation coefficient.