The influence of quality maternity waiting homes on utilization of facilities for delivery in rural Zambia

Table 4 Likelihood of facility-based birth by Maternity Home: any and quality level

	No. of Births	Facility-based Births No (%)	Odds ratio (95% CI)	Adjusted OR (95% CI)
MWH or Waiting Space at Facility
No^a	7815	4371 (55.9)	1.00	1.00
Yes	9385	5698 (60.7)	1.22 (1.15, 1.29)	1.19 (1.10, 1.29)
Type of Waiting Space
None^a	7815	4371 (55.9)	1.00	1.00
Space but no MWH	1392	1055 (75.8)	2.47 (2.17, 2.81)	2.13 (1.85, 2.46)
MWH	7993	4643 (58.1)	1.09 (1.03, 1.16)	1.07 (0.98, 1.16)
Rank of MWH^c
Low^a	3142	1550 (49.3)	1.00	1.00
Medium/High	4851	3093 (63.8)	1.81 (1.65, 1.98)	1.95 (1.76, 2.16)

^areference group
^bControlling for maternal age, any maternal education, asset quartile, parity, maternal HIV status, four or more ANC visits, distance to health facility, SMGL program implementation, facility capacity
^cOnly among those with an existing MWH structure and a score (missing 3 facilities with designated spaces that were not able to be scored)

ISSN: 1742-4755