Skip to main content
Download PDF

Male reproductive health challenges: appraisal of wives coping strategies

Reproductive Health volume 14, Article number: 90 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Systematic studies on the association between men’s sexual dysfunction (low sexual desire, ejaculation disorders, erectile dysfunctions, genital ulcers, testicular disorders, prostate cancer or sexually transmitted infections) and marital conflict are emerging. However, the coping strategies adopted by wives in such circumstances are not commonly reported in the literature. Male sexual functioning is vital to the marital relationship, lack of it can result in intolerable cohabitation or relationship breakdown, and could also cause infertility, infidelity, and arouse stigma in Nigeria. The understanding of coping strategies by female partners could guide in the counselling and treatment of men’s sexual health problems. Effective coping has the potential to lessen or prevent negative outcomes, and thereby could reduce marital conflict.

Objectives

This study examined the coping strategies adopted by women whose husbands have reproductive health challenges in two of the five states with the highest proportion of divorce/separation in Nigeria.

Methods

Four focus group discussions were conducted in two local government areas. The women were recruited from a quantitative couple-study for men with sexual health problems. Focus group responses were transcribed and analysed using systematic-content-analysis with thematic organisation of the summaries and systematic typologies of participants’ responses.

Results

The results revealed the coping strategies employed by women in this environment: seeking guidance from their religious leaders and family doctors, physical-sexual-therapy, abstinence and concubinage. The participants indicated that they encountered difficulties in discussing their husbands’ sexual health problems with a third party.

Conclusion

The study concludes that husband’s sexual ability is crucial to the sustenance of the marital relationship. Religious leaders and family doctors often serve as mediators to husband-wife conflict management. Counselling is recommended in cases of sexual health problems. Husbands should be encouraged to seek treatment and share their sexual challenges with their spouse. The medical officers and religious leaders could also be trained in family-conflict management.

Peer Review reports

Plain English summary

There are many male reproductive health challenges, such as low sexual desire, ejaculation disorders, penile disorders, impotence, and painful erections; these conditions may be associated with negative changes in intimate relationships including marital dissatisfaction and conflict. Male reproductive health challenges also include genital ulcers, testicular disorders, prostate cancer or sexually transmitted infections that could result in infertility or a breakdown of the intimate relationship. Couples facing infertility may experience shame, especially in traditional African settings where the importance of masculinity and patriarchy remain strong and childlessness is greatly stigmatized. Support for reproductive health can be critical to sustaining the marital relationship and the quality of this relationship.

This study assessed the coping strategies adopted by women whose husbands have reproductive health challenges in two Nigerian states with some of the highest rate of divorce. Participants were recruited from a quantitative couple-study where their male partners experienced sexual health problems. Four focus group discussions were organised in two local government areas. Respondents were asked about their knowledge of male sexual disorders, the challenges experienced by their husbands, the support they provided, their sex life, their current level of sexual satisfaction, and the strategies used to cope with their husband’s conditions.

The results of these discussions revealed that their husbands experienced a range of sexual disorders: low sexual desire, ejaculation disorder, impotence, erectile dysfunction, genital ulcers, testicular disorders and prostate cancer. It also found that participants sought guidance from community/religious leaders and family doctors, received physical-sexual-therapy, abstained from sexual relations and concubinage as strategies to cope with these conditions.

The coping strategies adopted by women could be important for marriage counsellors, social workers, and medical personnel. Counselling is recommended for the management of men’s sexual health problems, especially among women as a crucial tool to reduce marital conflict. Men should also be encouraged to seek treatment and to share their sexual challenges with their partners.

Background

When the husband suffers from a sexual disease, both the marital partners are affected [1,2,3]. How the wife provides support and copes with these conditions is crucial to the quality of the relationship and its longevity [4]. Studies have examined spousal communication in cases of prostate cancer and sexually transmitted infections (STI) [5,6,7]. In addition, a number of studies have investigated coping behaviours of wives of alcoholics, marital and domestic conflict, where coping varied by culture [6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, studies that have documented the coping strategies that the wives employed in instances of husband’s sexual challenges in Nigeria, especially in terms of qualitative assessment, are missing in the literature.

Male reproductive health challenges are a range of disorders that affect the male reproductive system. These include penile disorders, erectile dysfunction, balanitis (swelling of the foreskin or penis), prostate cancer, genital ulcers, testicular disorders, low sperm count, painful or premature ejaculation, loss of libido, urethral discharge, and sexually transmitted infections [12,13,14,15]. These conditions, depending on their nature, if left untreated, could affect wellness [16, 17] with great consequences on the marital relationship [4, 16, 17] and disruptions in other areas of life [4, 16,17,18,19]. Although these conditions may not be life-threatening [15, 17], they are rarely reported [4, 20, 21] and are associated with social stigma [4, 15, 19], especially in Nigeria where discussions of sexual health are rare [17, 22].

There has been a global increase in male sexual disorders [4, 18, 20, 23, 24], and more than three out of every 10 Nigerian men have reported erectile dysfunction or another sexual problem [15, 17, 20,21,22, 25]. Although, the prevalence of these conditions are also high in other countries such as India, the mortality rate is higher in Nigeria [23, 26]. Sexual dysfunction threatens wellbeing and the future of their families [20, 21, 27]. It has implications for both men and their intimate partners [16, 20, 21]. In the traditional African system, where conjugal unions are sacred and expected to result in child bearing, strategies for sustaining such conjugal unions are essential [22, 28]. Specifically, husband-wife conflict affects the family relationship and has damaging social and economic consequences [4, 16, 19]. The incidence of marital instability, disruption and disintegration, and conflict resulting in violence or separation have increased worldwide, and in Nigeria [4, 20, 29]. While several factors have been suspected to be responsible for the husband-wife conflict, the impact of husband’s reproductive health problems have not been well documented [27, 30, 31].

This study is anchored on the way-of-coping theory, as developed by Folkman and Lazarus in 1980s. This theory defines coping as the sum of cognitive and behavioural efforts to handle demands (either internal or external) which are considered taxing, demanding or problematic [32]. In this regard, coping strategies are reactive behaviours employed to seek solutions or adapt to situations that emerge due to stressors [33] (i.e. husband sexual problem). While there are variants of coping strategy typologies [32,33,34,35,36], the simplified ideas are: altering the problem directly, altering one’s view of the problem, and managing the unpleasant feelings aroused by the problem [32, 36]. Similar understandings of coping have been used in other sexual health studies [4, 19, 37]. This study is concerned with the specific coping efforts, including behavioral actions of women in managing the sexual health problems of their husbands and the implications for their marriage.

Some instances of male sexual dysfunction are not preventable; however, the resulting marital conflict may have solution through effective management. To date, the coping methods of marital conflict or dissatisfaction caused by husband’s sexual problems have not been explored in the literature, especially in Nigeria. This study is, therefore timely, considering the increased rate of divorce, martial conflict and their associated consequences such as multiple sexual networking, ‘concubinage’ and vulnerability to HIV/AIDS and other STIs in sub-Saharan Africa [4, 38, 39]. The aim of this study is to describe the coping strategies of women confronted with reproductive health challenges in their husbands.

Methods

Study design

This study used focus group discussions (FGD) to explore the coping strategies adopted by women whose husbands had reproductive health disorders. Focus group discussions were used to encourage interactions among participants. The focus group discussions offered the opportunity to seek clarifications, raise follow-up questions and probe for more information.

Elements of framework analysis were used in data analysis. According to Ritchie and Spencer (1994) and Green and Thorogood (2004), framework analysis involves series of interconnected stages ranging from familiarisation, identifying a thematic framework, indexing, charting, mapping and interpretation [40, 41]. In addition, the technique permits the themes to evolve from the research questions as well as the responses from participants [40,41,42,43]. Framework analysis focuses on the development of real-life findings through the use of content analysis method in which responses were summarised and classified into themes [40, 41, 44]. Framework analysis is suited for applied research where the concern is to have practical approaches or offer solutions to a problem, especially on health-related issues.

Study location

These focus groups were part of a larger study on male sexual diseases and relationships in Nigeria, funded by the Covenant University, Nigeria in 2011 (Grant No: CUCRID-RG/AMOO/PHD/2007; details also indicated at the funding section). The study was conducted in two states (Lagos and Osun), two of those with the highest rate of divorce/separation in the country [45]. In addition, the two states have a similar ethnic profile, and are bound by a common Yoruba language. One local government area (LGA) was selected in each state and a convenience sample of health facilities were then selected. Permissions were obtained from the management of each of the health facilities: two state hospitals, 19 private hospitals and eight traditional medical homes.

Recruitment of participants

The parent study was a couple-study in which husband and wife were selected randomly on their clinic days and interviewed after informed consent had been obtained. Most men did not attend clinics with their wives, therefore, health personnel assisted in inviting the majority of male participants. Focus group participants were screened and recruited from the parent study among the wives of men who reported a current or past sexual disorder. An additional permission was obtained from the couple to participate in the FGD. Women under-15 and above 50 years of age were excluded, as women of reproductive age were the target-group of interest. In a marital relationship, we considered the intimate partners to be husband and wife, hence the choice of wives as the sample. The basic characteristics of participants (such as age, occupation, education, and so on) were assessed at the commencement of the interview.

Data collection

A community hall was chosen for FGDs, where participants would feel comfortable, void of distractions, free to discuss, and easily accessible. Two FGDs were conducted per state with 8 to 12 participants each. The participants were split into two age groups (15–34 and 35–50 years), this was done to gain insight into variations in coping between age groups. For each of the age groups (15–34 and 35–50), only two FGDs were held. The small number of focus groups was due to a limited number of invitees available. Participants were volunteers and no incentive was provided due to limited funding. Nevertheless, the small number of FGDs was manageable and provided sufficient data. Each FGD lasted between 90 min and 2 h. The discussion continued until little or no new information was provided and theoretical saturation was reached.

A medical practitioner moderated the FGDs; they were chosen to avoid misinterpretation of health conditions. Discussions were held in Yoruba (local dialect), though some individuals combined Yoruba and English, or used Pidgin English. The focus group guide was adapted from the Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS), the Sexual Satisfaction Scale, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the sexual function questionnaire [16, 19, 31, 46, 47]. Respondents were asked about their knowledge and experience of male sexual reproductive problems.

Validity and integrity of the data

The wide range of participants’ characteristics (age, education, occupation and sexual problem) makes the findings more representative and aid in contrasting opinions among the participants. To ensure further validity and integrity of the data, texts were reviewed by participants to ensure correctness. The transcripts were also reviewed by researchers with qualitative expertise who were not involved in this study. Multiple readings of transcripts were conducted to detect further themes, to confirm that all transcripts follow the same verbatim approach to transcription and to reduce bias in the identification of themes [41]. The results of the analysis were also presented to non-participating women and colleagues who considered the suitability of the results.

Data analysis

Field notes were taken during all focus groups. Responses were transcribed and analysed using ‘systematic-content-analysis’ [4, 40]. The transcripts and field notes were read several times to have an overall impression of the data. Recurrent responses and common themes were classified using the ‘scissors and paste’ approach [40].

Repeated review of transcript data and field notes eased identification of the emerging and recurrent concepts. Concepts were coded and organised into categories for each transcript and then merged together. Themes were further refined by adding more concepts, split or combined [4, 19, 41, 43, 44, 47, 48]. Responses that could not be directly grouped were discussed among reviewers and re-grouped. The relevance and importance of responses and the connections with other themes were discussed.

A Microsoft Word document was created detailing responses to each question, these were later cross-tabulated by age group for comparison: (1) 15–34 years and (2) 35–50 years. The results were benchmarked with existing literature. Data analysis adhered to qualitative research review guidelines (RATS) that places emphasis on the relevance of research questions, appropriateness of methods, transparency, and soundness of interpretive approach [40, 49]. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was used in presentation of this research [48].

Results

The majority of participants were 35 years and older and were married for an average of 8 years. Many respondents were economically active; they were engaged in trading or paid employment, while a few were full-time housewives. Among those who had never attended school, one in five could not read or write, but discussions in the local dialect and pidgin language gave opportunity for full participation by all respondents. All participants were married; however, the number of marriages and age at first marriage were not discussed (Table 1).

Table 1 Background characteristics of participants in the focus group discussion
Full size table

Reproductive health challenges identified

Participants indicated the sexual problems experienced by their spouses. Few women used the correct medical terminology for the disorders described. Notwithstanding, experienced medical facilitators were able to appropriately classify the conditions described by the respondents. The most common reproductive health challenges described by participants were: low sexual desire, ejaculation disorders, penile disorders, impotence (“okobo”/ “akura”), erectile dysfunction, and genital ulcers (“egbo abẹ”). A small number of women also mentioned testicular disorders and prostate cancer (“jẹjẹrẹ”). A woman aged 15–34 expressed that “After the surgery, he (her husband) had some time ago, things changed, ‘no action’ again”. Another woman (35–50 years) pointed out that her husband had prostate cancer but it had been removed. Other sexual health problems experienced are described in the following excerpts:

“Everything is ok for us, but the doctor confirmed that he has a challenge with the quantity of the sperm.” (Woman, aged 15–34).

“My husband has a problem with continuing erection, he sometimes withdraws midway” ( Woman , aged 35–50).

Coping mechanisms

A number of coping strategies to prevent, stem conflict or decrease escalation to divorce/separation were described in the FGDs. These strategies were used to manage the consequences of the husband’s sexual problems. A popular response from participants was that sexual disorders and/or infidelity underlay most domestic quarrels, but that these could be curtailed if the wife appropriately managed the situation.

Primary themes and sub-themes of coping strategies included seeking support from family doctors, seeking support from community leaders, resignation to fate, changes in sexual behavior and an intention to divorce, as depicted in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Primary themes from the focus group discussion on women coping strategies where husbands have reproductive health challenges

Full size image

Support from family doctors

Across all discussions, seeking support from family doctors was one of the important steps in coping. Nearly all participants complained to their family doctors of the sexual health problems of their husbands. The general perception among these participants was that the medical doctors and other health personnel were “divine helpers” in family matters, especially as it relates to the husband-wife relationship and “there is no reason to hide from them”. Participants believed health personnel were trained to be discreet. Excerpts from a few of the participants in both age groups are as follows:

“Why would you hide from those that can help you”? “You can’t hide from those who [can] deliver you” ( Woman, aged 35–50).

“Doctors are held in high esteem in our town, they are highly respected and most people have confidence in them because they are trained to keep secrets” ( W oman aged 15–34).

Resignation to fate

The results of the analysis revealed a popular coping strategy among the wives, a “resignation to fate approach”, where no effort was made to resolve the health problem, and the situation was considered closed or what they are destined to bear. Women describing this strategy were mostly older women, and the sexual problems ranged from ejaculation problems to low sperm count. Other comments supporting this response showed that “keeping to oneself (on the issue) is the best option”. A woman (aged 40) indicated that “an issue like this is not openly discussed”, hence the need to “remain with it” (to be silent over it). However, another participant (in age 35–50) believed that “If there is a deep affection between [the] couple, come rain and the sun, they must stay together”. Almost one-quarter of all participants indicated they have been ‘holding-on to fate’ in managing these health concerns. Related to this, another woman (aged 35–50) considered a ‘silent posture’ over disagreements on sexual matters as the best option to sustain the marriage: “for me, it is the best option for me, so as to allow tension to reduce”.

Support from community leaders

The next strategy for coping with their husband’s sexual problems was to seek support from community leaders, such as religious leaders (e.g. pastors, imams). Women in this category had husbands with libido problems and in some cases believed that their husbands’ disorders were the result of a spiritual attack. Seven of every ten participants reported seeking support from their spiritual leaders. Although, responses were not recorded by religious affiliation, remarks were made by more than half of all participants.

In addition to community leaders, support was often sought from relatives. Discussions highlighted that the couple may also be invited by elders in the community. In this context, the husband or wife had the opportunity to express their grievances while the elders intervened to resolve conflict or offer advice. The participants reported that punishments were given to the erring party or the guilty party was warned. A woman, aged 47, reported that “the fine could be anything: money, food or sacrifice”. Another woman (age 30), indicated that “it [also] depends on the ‘seriousness’ of the offence or the elders involved”. This was supported by two women (aged 35–50 years), who stated that if it is a sexual matter, the husband will be ordered to have sex with his spouse, unless the husband is impotent. Another woman (age 35–50) indicated that, “elders will know what to do”. Participants described that every decision reached by the elders must be strictly adhered to.

Changes in sexual behaviour

The study further showed that wives adopted behavioural changes when faced with their husband’s sexual dysfunction. Results indicated that there were different strategies adopted in cases of sexual impotence; one out every five women adjusted their ‘sexual appetite’. Almost one-third of the respondents affirmed that they sought relationships outside marriage (concubinage or extra-marital affairs). Many could not imagine what marriage stands for without sex.

“Now tell me, what is marriage without sex? Just to sleep together or be his cook?” (Woman, aged 15–34).

Among those who adjusted their sexual behavior, were women whose husbands had sperm problems or those who could not engage in sex. The majority of women who opted for concubinage were those whose husbands had erection problems, many of them were 15–34 years. Two participants, however, believed that their situation did not warrant seeking external sexual partners. These participants believed there was hope, the condition may be temporary and, according to them, seeking help could resolve the problems.

Few women, aged 35–50, indicated that they have adopted abstinence as a solution. Three of the participating women stated that the situation gave them the opportunity to pursue businesses and work without distorting their marital relationship. These women were older and most had at least one child. Most of the women who claimed they had been abstaining from sex and those who indicated that they diverted their attention to their businesses and spiritual matters described ‘sexual intercourse as a non-primary issue’. A woman (aged 35–50) responded that “after all, sex is not food”. These women believed the situation gave them the privilege of focusing on other family issues, friends, and their careers. Another woman (aged 35–50) responded: “we are only missing sexual closeness; we are not physically distant”. Only two respondents asserted that they adopted what can be termed “physical sexual therapy intervention” to salvage their relationships. This, according to the respondents, comprised of foreplay and creating fun with their husbands.

Divorce or separation

Responses from younger women (aged 15–34 years) favoured separation if the problem persisted. A participant indicated that, “if your husband cannot have sex with you, you will always be feeling you are not a woman or not attractive”. While women in this group affirmed that it was negligence on the part of husband to allow such problems to progress untreated, they also indicated that “there might not be any reason to “endure agony” arising from [any] man’s negligence”. Another woman, aged 15–34, indicated that having children was crucial to marriage, and if the husband could not impregnate her, she would not hesitate to leave. An excerpt from another woman in the same age group shows:

“If you want to manage it you can stay. […] If you want a child desperately, you don’t need to wait or announce your departure from his house” (Woman, aged 15–34).

Among women who preferred to stay married, they explained this choice based on the desire for children and economic reasons.

“If your man is the only bread winner of the family, you would not want to divorce or leave him just because of that [sex]” (Woman, aged 15–34).

“If kids have been there before the problem comes, what do you do, would you leave your children? No, you just have to stay for the sake of your children” ( Woman, aged 15–34).

Few respondents believed that marriage becomes sacrosanct the moment it is solemnised and the party should stay together “for better and for worst”.

“If there is deep loving affection between couple, come rain and the sun, they stay together” ( Woman, aged 35–50).

Reporting sexual health problems

In addition to the primary themes identified, findings indicated that wives encountered challenges in reporting or discussing their husband’s sexual problem. The majority of participants indicated that when a problem is discovered; the wife cannot easily report their concerns. The general impression was that “husbands are well-respected as the head, authority over the spouse and whatever issues pertaining to them (i.e. the husband) can only be uttered by them alone”.

“It is a painful situation”. “[…] It has never been a subject of open discussion since ages”. (Woman, aged 35–50).

“Most men you see around have so much under their clothes, I mean, they hide so many problems to themselves” (Woman, aged 35–50).

There was consensus, especially among older participants, that sexual problems cannot be easily reported, not only due to tradition, but also because of the manner the husband may interpret this act. Few of their responses are as follows:

“You remain silent over it”, “[…] it is not a subject of discussion with your neighbours”. ( Woman, aged 35–50).

“If the man hears you tell anyone, he might scrape off your head” ( Woman, aged 35–50).

A few women indicated that it is dangerous to remain married to an impotent man: “Coping with an impotent man is dangerous; they are always nervous, worry, aggressive and ill-tempered” (Woman, aged 35–50).

Participants were asked whether they had recently discussed with their husbands the need to seek a solution. Almost half of the participants affirmed they have indirectly done so stating that “action speaks louder than voice”. Some suggestions offered by participants include, spiritual assistance, ‘mandating’ the family doctor to perform medical tests and reducing the consumption of certain food or alcohol.

Discussion

This study provides evidence of coping strategies used by women whose husbands have sexual health problems. These findings extend beyond existing studies on husband-wife communication and wives coping with alcoholic spouses [5,6,7] or sexual function, attitude and lifestyles [9, 11, 16, 17, 20, 21]. Apart from adding to the body of knowledge on marital relationships, the findings may help in sustaining relationships notwithstanding the threat of sexual dysfunction, especially in the study location and by extension sub-Saharan Africa. While little research has focused on the intimate sexual relationship, this study exclusively dealt with the wife’s response to sexual challenges faced by her husband.

Among the important contributions of this study, is the development of a thematic framework demonstrating the coping strategies of women with husbands that have reproductive health problems. Several of the primary themes suggested that the conjugal relationship could be sustained in spite of these sexual health problems. It also highlighted that rather than resigning to fate alone, seeking guidance from health practitioners, especially family doctors and discussion between the spouses (husband-wife communication) could help. This finding is in concordance with coping mechanisms that suggest that appropriate responses could deal with external stressors in a manner to avoid conflict [32, 33, 35]. Access to health practitioners for the management of sexual health problems could prevent domestic conflict, as found in other studies [4,5,6,7]. Older respondents were more likely to be in favour of adjusting their sex life, such as abstinence and sexual therapy, rather than seeking external partners or separation.

The patterns of responses indicated two groups: (1) situations in which women may separate, divorce or engage in concubinage, and (2) situations in which women would endure sexual problems and maintain the marriage. The majority in the first group had husbands with erectile problem or suffered from premature ejaculation. Women in the second group had children and husbands with genital ulcers or testicular cancer. The second group also included women whose husbands were the breadwinners, women that resigned to fate or believed there was hope for the problem to be solved. The finding that women might not want to divorce or separate if children are involved, is similar to findings from Botha and Booysen (2012) and D’Souza, Karkada, Somayaji & Venkatesaperumal (2013). If the couple already had children, the wife might consider the future challenges children would face if they divorced [10, 28]. Many cited the presence of children and finances as fundamental factors for not divorcing. Additional information gathered suggested that financial buoyancy could play a vital role in keeping the marriage intact. The patriarchal system is strong in Nigeria, there are likely to be negative consequences for women who report their husband’s sexual health challenges [22].

A number of participants opted for separation or sexual relationships outside the marriage which may increase transmission of HIV/AIDS and other sexual transmitted infections [38, 39]. Since men rarely report sexual health problems [21], knowledge from their wives could be helpful to marriage counsellors, social workers, and medical personnel to guide diagnosis and management.

Limitations of the study

There are limitations of this study, which include the use of a convenience sample of health facilities which limits generalizability of the findings. The sexual health problems were self-reported and were not confirmed through medical testing. The small number of FGDs could also be a limitation to the scope of the study. Finally, the combination of all male sexual health problems together may hide the variations inherent in different sexual challenges. This study only established responses by husband’s reproductive health problems and ages, other characteristics such as year of marriage were not collected.

Conclusions

This study has added to the body of knowledge on coping strategies for sexual challenges. This study concludes that husband’s sexual health is crucial to the sustenance of the marital relationship and that religious leaders, as well as family doctors, may be indispensable mediators in husband-wife conflict management. However, the fact that the wives cannot easily discuss or report sexual health dysfunctions can be an obstacle to a healthy relationship. This work is essential for planning couple sexual health services in Nigeria, and where appropriate, couples should be encouraged to attend clinic together for counselling and treatment. Counselling on the management of men’s sexual health problems, especially among the wives, is recommended. Men should also be encouraged to seek treatment and share their sexual challenges with their partners (Additional file 1).

Abbreviations

AIDS:

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

COREQ:

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research

CUCRID:

Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development

EAs:

Enumeration areas

FGD:

Focus group discussion

GRISS:

Golombok rust inventory of sexual satisfaction

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

IIEF:

International index of erectile function

LGA:

Local government area

RATS:

Qualitative Research Review Guidelines (Relevance of study question, appropriateness of methods, transparency, and soundness of interpretive approach)

STIs:

Sexual transmitted infections

References

  1. Haapala C. Stress, coping strategies, and marital satisfaction in spouses of military service members, master of social work, clinical research papers. Minnesota: St. Catherine University, St. Paul and Minneapolis; 2012. p. 1–31.

  2. Stutzer A, Frey BS. Does marriage make people happy, or do happy people get married? J Socio-Econ. 2006;35(2):326–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wheeler AR, Stone RAT. Exploring stress and coping strategies among national guard spouses during times of deployment: a research note. Armed Forces Soc. 2009;36(3):545–57.

  4. Mitchell KR, King M, Nazareth I, Wellings K. Managing sexual difficulties: a qualitative investigation of coping strategies. J Sex Res. 2011;48(4):325–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray RE, Fitch M, Phillips C, Labrecque M, Fergus K. To tell or not to tell: patterns of disclosure among men with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2000;9(4):273–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. James JE, Goldman M. Behavior trends of wives of alcoholics. Q J Stud Alcohol. 1971;32(2):373–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rao TS, Kuruvilla K. A study on the coping behaviours of wives of alcoholics. Indian J Psychiatry. 1992;34(4):359.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Amoo EO, Omideyi AK, Fadayomi TO. Impacts of male reproductive health diseases on conjugal satisfaction in Nigeria and wives’ coping strategies. In: Wusu O, Ezebunwa N, Ntoimo L, editors. Demographic issues in Nigeria: insights and implications. Bloomington: Author House Publishers; 2015. p. 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boehmer U, Clark JA. Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(3):226.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Souza MS, Karkada SN, Somayaji G, Venkatesaperumal R. Women’s well-being and reproductive health in Indian mining community: need for empowerment. Reprod Health. 2013;10(1):24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Grant CH, Hart JL, Walker KL. Couples, culture, and cancer. Intercultural Commun Stud. 2005;14(3):83.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SW. Prostatic disease and sexual dysfunction. Korean J Urol. 2011;52(6):373–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Saslow D, Castle PE, Cox JT, Davey DD, Einstein MH, Ferris DG, et al. American cancer society guideline for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):7–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunn KM, Das S, Das R. Male reproductive health: a village based study of camp attenders in rural India. Reprod Health. 2004;1(1):7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ariba AJ, Oladapo OT, Iyaniwura CA, Dada OA. Management of erectile dysfunction: perceptions and practices of Nigerian primary care clinicians. S Afr Fam Pract. 2007;49(9):16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell KR, Mercer CH, Ploubidis GB, Jones KG, Datta J, Field N, et al. Sexual function in Britain: findings from the third national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles (Natsal-3). Lancet. 2013;382(9907):1817–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Idung A, Abasiubong F, Ukott I, Udoh S, Unadike B. Prevalence and risk factors of erectile dysfunction in Niger delta region, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2012;12(2):160–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aytac I, McKinlay J, Krane R. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. BJU Int. 1999;84:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitchell KR. Sexual dysfunction: conceptual and measurement issues. Doctoral dissertation, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2008. p. 1–398.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Omisanjo O, Fabola O, Aleetan O, Babatunde A, Taiwo A, Ikuerowo S. Prevalence and treatment pattern of erectile dysfunction amongst men in southwestern Nigeria. Internet J Sex Med. 2014;3(Number 1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oyelade BO, Jemilohun AC, Aderibigbe SA. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction and possible risk factors among men of South-Western Nigeria: a population based study. Pan African Med J. 2016;24(1):1–8. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC5012735/.

  22. Amoo EO, Oni GA, Ajayi MP, Idowu AE, Fadayomi TO, Omideyi AK. Are men’s reproductive health problems and sexual behavior predictors of welfare? Am J Mens Health. 2015. doi:10.1177/1557988315598832.

  23. Akinde OR, Phillips AA, Oguntunde OA, Afolayan OM. Cancer mortality pattern in Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;2015:842032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Khalaf I, Levinson I. Erectile dysfunction in the Africa/Middle East region: epidemiology and experience with sildenafil citrate (Viagra®). Int J Impot Res. 2003;15:S1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Afolayan AJ, Yakubu MT. Erectile dysfunction management options in Nigeria. J Sex Med. 2009;6(4):1090–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Awodele O, Adeyomoye AA, Awodele DF, Fayankinnu VB, Dolapo DC. Cancer distribution pattern in south-western Nigeria. Tanzan J Health Res. 2011;13(2):106–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morokqff PJ, Gillilland R. Stress, sexual functioning, and marital satisfaction. J Sex Res. 1993;30(1):43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Botha F, Booysen F. The relationship between marital status and life satisfaction among South African adults. Acta Acad. 2013;45(2):150.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Clark S, Brauner-Otto S. Divorce in sub-Saharan Africa: are unions becoming less stable? Popul Dev Rev. 2015;41(4):583–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bodenmann G, Ledermann T, Bradbury TN. Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Pers Relat. 2007;14(4):551–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rust J, Golombok S. The Golombok-Rust inventory of sexual satisfaction (GRISS). Br J Clin Psychol. 1985;24(1):63–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav. 1980;21:219–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Billings AG, Moos RH. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. J Behav Med. 1981;4(2):139–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav. 1978;19(1):2–21.

  35. Lazarus RS, Kanner AD, Folkman S. Emotions: a cognitive-phenomenological analysis. Theories Emotion. 1980;1:189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Menaghan E. Measuring coping effectiveness: a panel analysis of marital problems and coping efforts. J Health Soc Behav. 1982;23:220–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt L, Holstein B, Christensen U, Boivin J. Communication and coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: cohort study of 816 participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility treatment. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3248–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Agyei-Mensah S. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa: homogeneity or heterogeneity? Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian J Geogr. 2005;59(1):14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. UNAIDS. Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. UNAIDS/JC2502/1/E, November 2013. [Internet]. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); 2013. Available from: http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/UNAIDS_Global_Report_2013_en_1.pdf.

  40. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2004. p. 279.

  41. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Analyzing qualitative data. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Akeju DO, Vidler M, Oladapo OT, Sawchuck D, Qureshi R, von Dadelszen P, et al. Community perceptions of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia in Ogun state, Nigeria: a qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Srivastava A, Thomson SB. Framework analysis: a qualitative methodology for applied policy research. Joaag. 2009;4(2):72–9.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers; 2009. p. 284.

  45. National Population Commission. Population and housing census of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Back to cited text. 2009;12:60.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Meston C, Trapnell P. Development and validation of a five-factor sexual satisfaction and distress scale for women: the sexual satisfaction scale for women (SSS-W). J Sex Med. 2005;2(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997;49(6):822–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Clark J. RATS guidelines. How to peer review a qualitative manuscript; 2003. p. 219–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID) for funding the project and the University Ethical/Research Committees for advice at all stages of the survey. We thank the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, for providing resources and facilities that enhanced the final preparation of the manuscript. We also recognise the responses from our anonymous respondents as their contributions to humanity.

Funding

The scholarship award for the Ph.D under which the data were collected was provided by the Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID). The centre was also responsible for the ethical approval of the tools used for this study through the University Ethics/Research Committees. The Data and final Ph.D report of the study were deposited with the Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID), Covenant University, Ota, Ogun state, Nigeria. Grant No: CUCRID-RG/AMOO/PHD/2007. http://covenantuniversity.edu.ng/Research2#.WWvV44jyvIU.

Availability of data and materials

This study is based on a qualitative data which we are not in the position to share because the ethical clearance for the study forbids such. In addition, only the funder, University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID) has custody of the transcript. Details of the transcript have respondents’ names attached to their account.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Andrew Mellon Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow, Demography and Population Studies, Schools of Public Health and Social Sciences, Faculties of Health Sciences and Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Emmanuel O. Amoo

  2. Department of Demography and Social Statistics, College of Business and Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria

    Emmanuel O. Amoo & Gbolahan A. Oni

  3. Department of Demography and Social Statistics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Nigeria

    Adekunbi K. Omideyi

  4. Economics Department, Elizade University, Ilaramokin, Ekiti State, Nigeria

    Theophilus O. Fadayomi

  5. Sociology Department, College of Business and Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria

    Mofoluwake P. Ajayi & Adenike E. Idowu

  6. Postdoctoral Fellow, DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, Demography and Population Studies, Schools of Public Health and Social Sciences, Faculties of Health Sciences and Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Adenike E. Idowu

Authors
  1. Emmanuel O. Amoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adekunbi K. Omideyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Theophilus O. Fadayomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mofoluwake P. Ajayi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gbolahan A. Oni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Adenike E. Idowu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EOA was the principal investigator and the originator of the idea. He designed the research methods, coordinated the data analyses and interpretation, sketched the diagram and drafted the manuscript. AKO was the main supervisor for the project and oversaw the compilation of the manuscript and data interpretation. TOF was the second supervisor for the project and ensured logical and timely presentation of the results. MPA was very active in the fieldwork, took notes during the focus group discussion (FGD) and coordinated the transcriptions. GAO was assigned the responsibility of editing the manuscript. AEI coordinated the recruitment of respondents and was the liaison officer between our research cluster and the University Ethical/Research Committee and Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel O. Amoo.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ information

EOA was the principal investigator and the originator of the idea. He designed the research methods, coordinated the data analyses and interpretation, sketched the diagram and drafted the manuscript. EOA is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow (Andrew Mellon Foundation) in the programme of Demography and Population Studies, Schools of Public Health and Social Sciences, Faculties of Health Sciences and Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. He is also a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Demography and Social Statistics, Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria. He obtained his Ph.D (Demography and Social Statistics) from Covenant University, Nigeria, and B.Sc and M.Sc in Demography and Social Statistics from Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria in 1993 and 1998, respectively. He worked in research and manufacturing sectors for a few years before he joined full-time academic profession in2007. He is a member of several international bodies e.g. International Sociological Association (ISA) and Population Association of Nigeria (PAN). His research focus has been in men’s reproductive health and has a few articles to his credit in high impact journals.

AKO was the main supervisor for the project and oversaw the compilation of the manuscript and data interpretation. She is a Professor of Demography. She has her M.Sc and Ph.D in Demography from London School of Economics (LSE), London in 1977 and 1982 respectively. Had her B.Sc (Economics) in 1974 from University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile-Ife, Nigeria. She is currently a Professor of Demography in Department of Demography and Social Statistics, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. She has published several articles in internationally reputed journals. In addition to her university activities, she has consulted in the Evaluation of USAID Projects in Nigeria (COMPASS and ENHANCE), Abuja, 2008; she was a Visiting Fellow in Urban Rural and Economic Development (URED) Research programme, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria, Visiting Researcher and Associate, African Gender Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, Visiting Scholar, Institute of population Studies, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom and a present Consultant, National Population Commission, Nigeria.

TOF was the second supervisor for the project and ensured logical and timely presentation of the results. TOF is a Professor of Economics/Demography and currently the Vice Chancellor of Elizade University, Ilara-Mokin, Ekiti State, Nigeria. He was a Senior Principal Demographer at African Development Bank (ADB) before joining Covenant University. He had his B.Sc (Economics) from University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University), Ile-Ife, Nigeria in 1968. He had his M.Sc, M.A (Economics and Demography) from London School of Economics (LSE), London, United Kingdom and Ph.D also in Economics and Demography from the University of Pennsylvania, United States between 1969 and 1976. He served as a Professor of Demography and Social Statistics in Covenant University, Nigeria until 2013.

MPA is an Industrial Sociologist and a Lecturer in the Department of Sociology, Covenant University. She obtained her first degree from University of Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria and her M.Sc and Ph.D Degrees in Industrial Sociology and Family Work-Life Balance from Covenant University, Nigeria. Her areas of research are industrial sociology, work-life balance, gender health and development. She is a member of the International Sociological Association (ISA), Nigerian Anthropological and Sociological Society (NASA) and Nigerian Sociological Society (NSS). MPA was very active in the fieldwork, took notes during the focus group discussion (FGD) and coordinated the transcriptions.

GAO was assigned the responsibility of editing the manuscript. GAO is a Professor of Public Health and Population Science. He was a former Director, ONIGA health and population programme LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. He had his M.Sc. and Post Graduate Diploma from University of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom in 1979 and 1997 respectively; Ph.D and Postdoctoral Fellowship from Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA and Princeton University, USA in 1985 and 1986 respectively. He had his Bachelor Degree (B.Sc) in Statistics from University of Lagos, Nigeria (1974). He has held senior level positions in academic, research and health programs in institutions in Africa, Middle East and the USA. He joined Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA in 1987 and worked there for several years. He has numerous articles to his credit in high impact journals. He has taught at several universities both in Nigeria and abroad for years. He is currently a Professor of Demography and Social Statistics at Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria.

AEI is currently a Postdoctoral Fellow of the DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, in University of the Witwatersrand. She obtained her Bachelor’s Degree, M.Sc and Ph.D in Sociology from Covenant University, Nigeria. She is a Lecturer in the Department of Sociology at Covenant University. Her research focus is in medical sociology. She was a recipient of CODESRIA (Council for the Development of Social Science Research in Africa) Grant for Annual Writing Workshop for Scholarly Publishing in 2013 and has more than 8 years teaching experience at the higher institution in both undergraduate level and research. She is a member of many international bodies such as Nigerian Anthropological and Sociological Association (NASA), Nigerian Sociological Society (NSS), International Society for Urban Health, New York. AEI coordinated the recruitment of respondents and was the liaison officer between our research cluster and the University Ethical/Research Committee and Covenant University Centre for Research, Innovation and Development (CUCRID).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All research instruments were subjected to review by the ethics committees of Covenant University. Necessary permissions were secured from the proprietors of the health facilities used for the main study and respondents were assured of the confidentiality of their responses and anonymous reporting of the research findings. As indicated in the manuscript, informed consent letters were signed and participants were encouraged to participate but were informed of their freedom to withdraw at any stage of the discussion.

Competing interests

The authors declare that we have no competing interests in relation to this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Discussion guide on Male reproductive health challenges and wives coping strategies. (DOC 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amoo, E.O., Omideyi, A.K., Fadayomi, T.O. et al. Male reproductive health challenges: appraisal of wives coping strategies. Reprod Health 14, 90 (2017). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12978-017-0341-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12978-017-0341-2

Keywords

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755