Skip to main content

Table 1 Rating of studies reviewed, using principles of quality outlined in the CASP tool

From: Preventing female genital mutilation in high income countries: a systematic review of the evidence

Reference

Study type (code)

Clear statement of the aims of the research

Appropriateness of methodology

Appropriateness of research design

Appropriate recruitment strategy

Appropriate data collection

Relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered

Ethical issues been taken into consideration

Rigorous data analysis

Clear statement of findings

Findings in context (Contribution to body of knowledge)

Quality of study

 

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

1 = Yes, 0 = Can’t Tell, − 1 = No

 

Johansen et al., 2018 [33]

P

1

1

 

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

Moderate