Skip to main content

Table 3 PISQ-IR 1 mean scores of our sample and from the literature[23]

From: A cross-sectional study on pelvic floor symptoms in women living with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

  Mean scores ± SD of women with FGM/C Mean scores ± SD of women without FGM/C
All (n = 124) I (n = 9) II (n = 41) III (n = 74) With PFD2
PISQ-IR1      
 SA-AO1 3.3 ± 1.1 (n = 85) 3.2 ± 0.9 (n = 8) 3.5 ± 0.9 (n = 27) 3.3 ± 1.2 (n = 50) 3.4 ± 0.8
 SA-PR1 3.4 ± 0.6 (n = 84) 3.8 ± 0.3 (n = 8) 3.4 ± 0.7 (n = 27) 3.4 ± 0.7 (n = 49) 3.2 ± 0.7
 SA-CS1 4.5 ± 0.8 (n = 84) 4.8 ± 0.4 (n = 8) 4.5 ± 1.1 (n = 27) 4.5 ± 0.7 (n = 49) 4.4 ± 0.7
 SA-CI1 3.8 ± 0.5 (n = 82) 3.9 ± 0.2 (n = 8) 3.7 ± 0.6 (n = 26) 3.8 ± 0.5 (n = 48) 3.0 ± 0.9
 SA-D1 2.9 ± 1.0 (n = 83) 2.8 ± 1.2 (n = 8) 3.0 ± 1.0 (n = 26) 2.9 ± 1.0 (n = 49) 3.0 ± 0.9
 SA-GQ1 3.9 ± 1.1 (n = 80) 3.5 ± 1.3 (n = 8) 3.7 ± 1.2 (n = 26) 4.1 ± 1.0 (n = 46) 3.0 ± 1.1
 NSA-CS1 1.5 ± 0.7 (n = 37) 1.0 ± 0.0 (n = 1) 1.4 ± 0.5 (n = 13) 1.5 ± 0.8 (n = 23) 2.8 ± 1.0
 NSA-PR1 2.6 ± 0.8 (n = 35) 2.5 ± 0.0 (n = 1) 2.6 ± 1.0 (n = 11) 2.6 ± 0.8 (n = 23) 2.2 ± 1.0
 NSA-CI1 1.2 ± 0.6 (n = 36) 1.0 ± 0.0 (n = 1) 1.1 ± 0.3 (n = 13) 1.3 ± 0.7 (n = 22) 2.1 ± 0.1
 NSA-GQ1 2.3 ± 1.2 (n = 37) 1.5 ± 0.0 (n = 1) 2.0 ± 1.2 (n = 13) 2.6 ± 1.2 (n = 23) 2.9 ± 1.2
  1. 1Pelvic organ prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire—IUGA Revised (PISQ-IR) for Sexually Active (SA) and Non-Sexually Active (NSA), Arousal and Orgasm (AO), Partner-Related impact on activity/inactivity (PR), Condition-Specific impact on activity/inactivity (CS), Condition-specific Impact on quality (CI), Desire (D), and Global Quality (GQ)
  2. 2Pelvic floor dysfunction (urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse and/or fecal incontinence)