Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of socio-demographic characteristics of the participants between the three groups

From: Comparing the effect of two educational interventions on mothers’ awareness, attitude, and self-efficacy regarding sexual health care of educable intellectually disabled adolescent girls: a cluster randomized control trial

Variable

Group training

N (%)

Training through booklet

N (%)

Control group

N (%)

p-value*

Age (years)

   

 0.63

 25–34

4 (15)

3 (11)

2 (8)

 

 35–44

11 (40)

12 (44)

12 (45)

 

 45–54

11 (41)

11 (41)

11 (40)

 

 ≥ 55

1 (4)

1 (4)

2 (7)

 

Spouse age (years)

   

0.74

 35–44

4 (15)

3 (11)

2 (7)

 

 45–54

11 (40)

13 (48)

10 (38)

 

 ≥ 55

12 (45)

11 (41)

15 (55)

 

Number of children

   

0.23

 1

3 (11)

2 (7)

1 (4)

 

 2

9 (34)

13 (48)

10 (37)

 

 ≥ 3

15 (55)

12 (45)

16 (59)

 

Educational level

   

0.17

 Elementary

1 (4)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

 Intermediate

9 (34)

12 (44)

9 (33)

 

 High school and diploma

13 (47)

9 (34)

14 (52)

 

 Academic

4 (15)

6 (22)

4 (15)

 

Job

   

0.31

 Employee

4 (15)

5 (19)

6 (22)

 

 Worker

2 (7)

0 (0)

0 (0)

 

 Housewife

20 (74)

17 (63)

16 (59)

 

 Other

1 (4)

3 (18)

5 (19)

 

Spouse educational level

   

0.29

 Elementary

2 (7)

1 (4)

1 (4)

 

 Intermediate

10 (37)

8 (29)

11 (41)

 

 High school and diploma

11 (41)

14 (52)

10 (37)

 

 Academic

4 (15)

4 (15)

5 (18)

 

Spouse job

   

0.44

 Unemployed

2 (7)

1 (4)

2 (7)

 

 Worker

4 (15)

7 (26)

8 (30)

 

 Employee

11 (41)

9 (33)

10 (37)

 

 Self employee

6 (22)

9 (33)

4 (15)

 

 Other

4 (15)

1 (4)

3 (11)

 

Age of id adolescent girl

   

0.23

 11–15

10 (37)

14 (52)

12 (44.5)

 

 16–20

17 (63)

13 (48)

15 (55.5)

 

Educational level of id adolescent girl

   

0.23

 Elementary

8 (29)

3 (11)

9 (34)

 

 Primary high school

4 (15)

18 (67)

14 (52)

 

 Secondary high school

14 (52)

6 (22)

2 (7)

 

 Diploma

1 (4)

0 (0)

2 (7)

 
  1. Id intellectually disabled
  2. *P < 0.05 was considered significant