How birth outcomes among a cohort of Guatemalan women with a history of prior cesarean vary by mode or birth across different interpregnancy intervals

Table 5 Individual logistic regressions of breastfeeding and stillbirth in the setting of repeat cesarean birth by varying IPIs

	IPI as continuous variable		IPI as dichotomous variable (< 12 vs \(\ge\) 12 months)		IPI as dichotomous variable (< 18 vs \(\ge\) 18 months)		IPI as dichotomous variable (< 24 vs \(\ge\) 24 months)
	aOR	95% CI	aOR	95% CI	aOR	95% CI	aOR	95% CI
Odds of Breastfeeding by 1 Hour (ref: did not breastfeed)	1.0	1.0,1.0	1.4	1.0,2.1	1.0	0.8,1.4	1.1	0.8,1.5
Odds of Stillbirth (ref: no stillbirth)	1.0	0.98,1.0	0.5	0.2,1.1	0.8	0.4,1.5	0.8	0.4,1.6

Note Adjusted for education, parity, body mass index, prenatal care, obstructed labor, induction of labor, hypertensive disease, and referral in labor; birth attendant and location of delivery were dropped from the model as physician providers are the only ones providing cesarean birth in the hospital with zero cells for non-physician providers and non-facility cesareans

ISSN: 1742-4755