Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression predicting demographic characteristics associated with supporting PAR

From: Attitudes toward posthumous assisted reproduction in China: a multi-dimensional survey

  

Public

IVF couples

ART practitioners

  

P

OR

95%CI

P

OR

95%CI

P

OR

95%CI

Gender

      

Not investigated

 Male

0.00*

0.54

0.38–0.77

0.01*

0.41

0.21–0.83

 Female

Referent

Referent

Age group

         

 ≤ 34

0.00*

3.48

1.76–6.90

0.01*

4.54

1.53–13.56

0.01*

4.83

1.55–15.07

 ≥ 35

Referent

Referent

Referent

Education level

      

Education levela

 Below college

0.00*

0.04

0.02–0.07

0.00*

0.05

0.01–0.19

0.66

1.27

0.44–3.61

 College degree

0.34

0.79

0.48–1.29

0.07

0.28

0.07–1.10

0.03*

3.18

1.10–9.16

 Above college

Referent

Referent

Referent

Occupation

      

Occupationb

 Liberal work

0.11

0.58

0.29–1.14

0.07

3.12

0.91–10.72

0.18

2.06

0.71–5.94

 Business

0.92

1.03

0.54–1.97

0.24

1.75

0.68–4.45

0.04*

2.42

1.05–5.58

 General staff

0.69

1.11

0.68–1.79

0.22

1.89

0.69–5.12

0.08

2.22

0.91–5.39

 Technical post

Referent

Referent

Referent

Monthly income (¥)

      

Professional levelc

 ≤ 3000

0.01*

2.53

1.28–5.03

0.04*

0.27

0.08–0.94

0.31

0.43

0.08–2.20

 3001–6000

0.03*

1.75

1.05–2.93

0.03*

0.33

0.13–0.87

0.07

0.27

0.07–1.12

 6001–9000

0.21

1.37

0.84–2.25

0.35

0.58

0.19–1.82

0.13

0.34

0.08–1.39

 ≥ 9001

Referent

Referent

Referent

Religion

      

Not investigated

 Yes

0.06

1.53

0.98–2.39

0.09

1.92

0.91–4.04

 No

Referent

Referent

House registration

      

Not investigated

 Rural

0.64

1.10

0.74–1.62

0.07

1.98

0.94–4.17

 Urban

Referent

Referent

Marital status

   

Marital statusd

   

 Married

0.01*

3.46

1.28–9.36

0.00*

5.07

1.96–13.13

0.01*

3.80

1.33–10.83

 Single

Referent

Referent

Referent

Pregnancy history

         

 Yes

0.41

0.56

0.14–2.23

0.56

0.70

0.21–2.30

0.01*

7.18

1.67–31.12

 No

Referent

Referent

Referent

Conceived manner

         

 Nature

0.03*

3.71

1.14–12.07

0.81

0.87

0.28–2.73

0.66

0.76

0.23–2.77

 ART

Referent

Referent

Referent

Children

         

 1

0.49

0.81

0.44–1.48

0.96

1.03

0.35–3.00

0.78

1.17

0.40–3.36

 ≥ 2

0.16

1.63

0.83–3.22

0.62

2.06

0.12–36.00

0.85

0.90

0.29–2.77

 None

Referent

Referent

Referent

  1. CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio
  2. aEducation level in ART practitioners was classified into “Below bachelor”, “Master”, and “PhD”. PhD was set as the referent
  3. bOccupation status in ART practitioners was classified into “Male-fertility specialist”, “Female-fertility specialist”, “Laboratory technicians” and “Nurse”. Nurse was set as the referent
  4. cProfessional level in ART practitioners was classified into “Primary”, “Secondary”, “Vice-senior”, and “Senior”. Senior was set as the referent
  5. dMarital status in IVF couples was classified into “First married”, and “Remarried”. Remarried was set as the referent
  6. *Significant items, P < 0.05
Back to article page

Reproductive Health

ISSN: 1742-4755